Academic CV
Best when the reader needs your academic and research record, presented clearly.
- Education
- Research and teaching
- Publications and talks you can confirm
- Projects, awards and service that are real
- Factual history, not a personal essay
Academic CV
This service helps applicants, researchers and academics organise and present genuine academic experience, research activity, teaching, projects and achievements so a reader can follow the record.
Which sections come first depends on the opportunity, not on one fixed template.
See the review about structureAssistantships, projects and thesis research, described at the level of work you actually did.
See the review about research experiencePublications and talks only at the status you can confirm.
See the review about scholarly activityTitles kept as they were. A teaching assistant is not renamed a lecturer.
See the review about teaching and rolesDates, wording and duplication made easier to scan, without new credentials.
See the review about clarityAcademic CV support is an editorial and structural review of a curriculum vitae built from information you provide. Depending on your actual background and the opportunity, a review may improve organisation, section order, clarity, consistency, academic tone, concise descriptions, date formatting, and how roles and scholarly activity are presented. The entries themselves have to be true and ones you can stand behind. One review does not include every section.
The useful order depends on whether you are applying for postgraduate study, a research opportunity, an academic or teaching role, a scholarship, a fellowship, or research-related employment. Institutions ask for different information. There is no single academic CV template and no single page length. If you supply a programme, scholarship, vacancy or fellowship description, genuine experience can be ordered and emphasised so it is easier to see. Experience is not created to match the description. Where that description uses a term you already use accurately, the wording can be aligned. That is not an applicant-tracking score, a pass, or a recruiter result.
If the document should be a short employment file built around professional roles and skills, resume support will be the closer fit
An academic CV is a fuller record of education, research, teaching, publications, conferences, projects, grants or awards, and academic service, but only where that record is real. A resume is the shorter employment document. Neither has one required length. A personal statement is the narrative of motivation and fit. A statement of purpose is the narrative of academic goals, preparation and programme fit. This page does not become either essay.
Best when the reader needs your academic and research record, presented clearly.
The closer fit for a concise employment document.
Education can show the institution, the degree, the field, the dates, a thesis or dissertation topic where it matters, and a distinction you actually received. A GPA, a rank, coursework, or an honour is not added if it is not yours. Research lines can name the setting, your role, methods you used, what you were responsible for, and a genuine output. If you assisted, the line does not say you led the work. A publication stays at its real status: published, in press, accepted, submitted, under review, or in preparation, and only when that status is true. A manuscript in preparation is not relabelled under review. Journal names, DOIs, volumes, acceptance, and publication are not invented. Author order stays as you supply it. Co-authors are not added, and corresponding-author status is not implied unless it is true. A talk, poster, workshop or seminar is listed as the kind of event it was. Attendance is not turned into a presentation, and an internal seminar is not turned into an international conference. Teaching titles stay accurate: a teaching assistant is not renamed a lecturer. Employment dates are not stretched, titles are not upgraded, and duties or measured results are not invented. A project can name its purpose, your part, and a real outcome, without presenting a team's work as yours alone. An award, honour, scholarship or grant is included only if you received it. An application is not an award, and a nomination is not a win. Skills are grouped and de-duplicated from capabilities you have. A tool is not added because a vacancy mentions it. A language level you supply is kept as you stated it. Fluency is not certified unless you supply a qualification that says so. A reference, if you include one, has to be a person you are allowed to name. Contact details and a claim that they agreed are not invented. A short profile can note your stage, interests, experience and aims. Labels such as leading researcher or internationally recognised scholar are not added unless they are already accurate and appropriate. Interests are organised from interests you have, not borrowed to match a posting.
If the need is a personal narrative, personal statement support is separate
Five steps, described here as a review of a record you already have. The Free Assessment page shows whether an online request can be submitted yet.
Say what you are applying for and what stage the CV is at.
Agree which sections and which presentation issues are included.
Organisation, clarity, relevance and consistency are reviewed from genuine information.
Wording and structure can be improved. Anything that needs a factual check is flagged.
You confirm every qualification, date, title, publication and achievement before you use the CV.
Illustrative academic CV example. This was written for this page. It is not a client CV. It shows a vague line becoming a clearer description of an assistant role. It does not invent project ownership, findings, an institution, a date, or a tool. Use only wording that matches the work you did.
Research Project — Worked on a project about renewable energy and was responsible for research.
The description is too broad. State the actual role and activities without implying responsibility you did not have.
Research Assistant — Renewable Energy Project. Supported literature review and data organisation for a study of solar-energy adoption.
You remain responsible for the accuracy of education, employment, research experience, publications, authorship, presentations, awards, grants, skills, memberships, dates and references. The review helps make a genuine academic record clearer and easier to read. It does not make a record look stronger by invention. If the main need is academic goals, research interests and programme fit written as a narrative, statement of purpose support is the closer page.
It is a curriculum vitae of your education, research, teaching and scholarly activity, arranged so a reader can follow a record that is already yours. It is a factual document, not an admissions essay.
An academic CV is usually the fuller academic and research record. A resume is the shorter employment document. Neither has one required length.
A review can organise and clarify information you provide. It does not supply missing qualifications, posts, or outputs.
Yes, by naming the setting, your actual role, and what you did. If you assisted, the line does not say you led the project.
Only entries and details you supply, and only at their real status. Scholarly work is not invented, and a manuscript in preparation is not relabelled as under review.
Use the status that is true: published, in press, accepted, submitted, under review, or in preparation. Journal names, DOIs, volumes and acceptance are not created, and author order is not changed to look stronger.
If you supply the description, genuine experience can be ordered and worded so the relevant parts are easier to see. Experience is not created to match the posting, and there is no applicant-tracking guarantee.
Yes, as a review of the academic record you already have, if a doctorate is the opportunity. That label describes the application. It is not a claim about who reviews the file, and it is not an offer of admission.
No. Gaps are not filled with projects, jobs, talks, awards, or skills you do not have. The review clarifies and organises what is true.
No. Clearer presentation of a genuine record does not guarantee admission, an interview, a scholarship, a job, or a committee's decision.
Ready to get started?
Selected service Academic CV Editing
Editing for an academic CV and the record it presents.
Share how we can reach you. An agent will contact you before any order is confirmed. Online submission may be unavailable on this connection.